Analisis Anomali Kebijakan: Prospek terhadap Kualitas Kebijakan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2024.010.01.5Keywords:
anomaly kebijakan; kegagalan kebijakan; kebijakan publikAbstract
The terminology of policy failure is potentially rejected by the government. Because the consequences of policy failure will have a negative impact on the image of the government itself. The concept of policy failure is a broad and useful concept policy analysis. Policy anomaly is a concept born of policy failure. The aim of this article, to review several research literature related to the concept and indicators of policy anomalies, to clarify the extent and through what mechanisms policy anomalies can be recognized in the public policy process. Several relevant literature related to policy anomalies have been reviewed. Based on the findings article, policy anomalies provide clues to learn from past mistakes by releasing the wrong way in managing and implementing public policies. As well, to understand more effectively the rules and procedures that hinder by focusing on analysis of policy failures. The main emphasis on management, program, and political anomalies analysis, and two dimensions of anomaly: bad formulation and bad implementation. Furthermore, anomaly analysis must address political debates on policy processes, often under-discussed. Because, can help develop an understanding of how governments fail in some ways, but not in other. So the policy solution given will be more targeted.
References
Andres, L., Bryson, J. R., Bakare, H., & Pope, F. (2023). Institutional logics and regional policy failure: Air pollution as a wicked problem in East African cities. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 41(2), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221136698
Andrews, M. (2021). Successful Failure in Public Policy Work Working Papers. CID Faculty Working Paper Series, December.
Bovens, M., & Hart, P. (1996). Understanding Policy Fiascoes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351293242
Braithwaite, J., Churruca, K., Long, J. C., Ellis, L. A., & Herkes, J. (2018). When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change. BMC Medicine, 16(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1057-z
Cambride Dictionary. (2023). Cambridge University Press & Assessment. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/anomaly
Compton, M. E., & Meier, K. J. (2017). Bureaucracy to Postbureaucracy: The Consequences of Political Failures. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.127
Damarsidi, H. R. (2017). Analisis Anomali Kebijakan Penempatan TKI : Eksploitasi Tenaga Kerja Indonesia sebagai Anak Buah Kapal. Journal of International Relations, 3(4), 40–48.
Dixit, S. K., & Sambasivan, M. (2018). A review of the Australian healthcare system: A policy perspective. SAGE Open Medicine, 6, 205031211876921. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118769211
Dowling, M.-E., & Legrand, T. (2023). “I do not consent”: political legitimacy, misinformation, and the compliance challenge in Australia’s Covid-19 policy response. Policy and Society, 42(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puad018
Dunlop, C. A. (2020a). Pathologies of policy learning: what are they and how do they contribute to policy failure?1. In Policy Learning and Policy Failure (pp. 23–48). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447352006.003.0002
Dunlop, C. A. (2020b). Policy learning and policy failure: definitions, dimensions and intersections. In Policy Learning and Policy Failure (pp. 1–22). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447352006.003.0001
Durand, R., Decker, P. J., & Kirkman, D. M. (2014). Evaluation Methodologies for Estimating the Likelihood of Program Implementation Failure. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(3), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214014523824
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. December.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
Hayes, A. (2021). Anomaly: Definition and Types in Economics and Finance. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/anomaly.asp
Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementation of Public Policy (Vol. 2). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v2i1.246
Hoefer, R. (2021). The Surprising Usefulness of the Policy Stages Framework. Journal of Policy Practice and Research, 2(3), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42972-021-00041-2
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying Public Policy, Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
Howlett, Michael. (2012). The lessons of failure: learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making. International Political Science Review, 33(5), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512112453603
Howlett, Michael, Ramesh, M., & Wu, X. (2015). Understanding the persistence of policy failures: The role of politics, governance and uncertainty. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715593139
Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help? Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378
Kärnä, A., Karlsson, J., Engberg, E., & Svensson, P. (2023). Political failure: a missing piece in innovation policy analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 32(7), 1037–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2022.2070843
Kirikkaleli, D., & Osmanlı, A. (2023). The Impact of Political Stability on Environmental Quality in the Long Run: The Case of Turkey. Sustainability, 15(11), 9056. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119056
Leong, C., & Howlett, M. (2022). Policy Learning, Policy Failure, and the Mitigation of Policy Risks: Re-Thinking the Lessons of Policy Success and Failure. Administration & Society, 54(7), 1379–1401. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211065344
Lovell, H. (2019). Policy failure mobilities. Progress in Human Geography, 43(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517734074
Mark, B., & Paul’t, H. (1996). Understanding Policy Fiascoes. Transaction Books.
Matheson, C. (2016). Politics and Public Policy. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 1–8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1407-1
McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding Policy Success. In Understanding Policy Success. The Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-08228-2
McConnell, A. (2011). Success? Failure? Something in-between? A framework for evaluating crisis management. Policy and Society, 30(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2011.03.002
McConnell, A. (2015). What is policy failure? A primer to help navigate the maze. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076714565416
Mubarok, R. M., Eriyanti, L. D., & Iqbal, M. (2021). Kegagalan Kebijakan Pemerintah Meksiko Mengatasi Krisis Feminicide. Journal of Feminism and Gender Studies, 1(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.19184/fgs.v1i1.21550
Nair, S., & Howlett, M. (2020). Policy myopia as a source of policy failure: adaptation and policy learning under deep uncertainty. In Policy Learning and Policy Failure (pp. 133–154). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447352006.003.0007
Norris, E., Kidson, M., Bouchal, P., & Rutter, J. (2014). Doing them justice: Lessons from four cases of policy implementation. Institute for Government, 12. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/Policy Implementation case studies report - final.pdf
Olavarría-Gambi, M. (2020). Policy Failure Revisited: Conceptual Implications From the Chilean Case of Transantiago. Administration & Society, 52(5), 690–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718786878
Riefky, Hutasoit, I. R., Nopiyanto, A. M. D., Nugrahani, H. S. D., & Zulkarnain, R. A. (2021). Growing public distrust towards the Indonesian Government for lack of response to COVID-19 outbreak. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 716(1), 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012072
Sausman, C., Oborn, E., & Barrett, M. (2016). Policy translation through localisation: implementing national policy in the UK. Policy & Politics, 44(4), 563–589. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557315X14298807527143
Signé, L. (2017). Policy Implementation – A Synthesis of the Study of Policy Implementation and the Causes of Policy Failure. OPC Policy Center, PP-17/03(March), 9–22. http://www.ocppc.ma/sites/default/files/OCPPC-PP1703.pdf
Somerville, P. (2021). The continuing failure of UK climate change mitigation policy. Critical Social Policy, 41(4), 628–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018320961762
Thomas, R. (2024). The Role of Hubris in Explaining Tourism Policy Failure: Some Observations and New Research Directions. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 65(1), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655231212201
Verge, T., & Lombardo, E. (2021). The contentious politics of policy failure: The case of corporate board gender quotas in Spain. Public Policy and Administration, 36(2), 232–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719852407
Wilder, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Paradigm Construction and the Politics of Policy Anomalies. In Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice (pp. 101–115). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137434043_6
Wisesa, R. G. (2021). Keberhasilan dan Kegagalan Indonesia dalam Kebijakan Kontraterorisme Indonesia ’ s Successes and Failures in Counterterrorism Policy. Indonesia’s Successes and Failures in Counterterrorism Policy, (September 2001), 1–12.
Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1991). The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85(3), 801–828. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963851
Zittoun, P. (2015). Analysing policy failure as an argumentative strategy in the policymaking process: A pragmatist perspective. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715581634
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
If your paper is accepted, the author identified as the formal corresponding author for the paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Author Services; where via the JIAP Author Licensing Service they will be able to complete the license agreement on behalf of all authors on the paper.