Akuntabilitas Kinerja Bidang Pertamanan DISPERKIM Kota Malang dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2021.007.01.14Keywords:
Good Governance, Sepkle & Verbeteen, Performance AccountabilityAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to describe the embodiment of performance accountability in DISPERKIM Parks Sector, Malang City. This paper is also based on the development concept of performance measurement from Speklé & Verbeeten (2014) through three indicators of operational use, incentive use, and explanatory use. The results of this study are: a) Operational use: in organizational operational planning and preparation of budget allocations is strongly influenced by institutional restructuring and the influence of regional heads in determining bureaucratic efficiency; b) Incentive use: the number of employees namely 214 people can only reach the target of 78.45%, so it’s not surprising that Malang City still receives accountability reports in the BB category; and c) Explanatory use: in the formulation of strategy and communication’s goal, the head of the department and the chief of sector are only limited to reviewing every quarter only, meaning there is no subordinate involvement in the formulation of strategy. For strategy and learning management it’s known that Parks Sector minimizes program and activity budgets, so that it’s used as a reference in observing budget absorptionReferences
Akbar, Rusdi., Pilcher, Robyn.A., & Brian Perrin. (2012). Performance measurement in Indonesia: the case of local government. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(3), 262-291. DOI: 10.1108/01140581211283878
Azwar, Saifuddin (2007). Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar
Bourgon, Jocelyne. (2007). Responsive, Responsible and Respected Government: Towards a New Public Administration Theory. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(1), 7-26. DOI: 10.1177/0020852307075686
Christensen, Tom., & Lægreid, Per. (2014). Performance and Accountability—A Theoretical Discussion and an Empirical Assessment. Public Organization Review, 15(2), 1-19.
Denhardt, J.V. & Denhardt, R.B. (2003). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Mardiasmo (2009). Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta: Andi
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, a Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications.
Pemkot Malang. (2018). LAKIP KOTA MALANG TAHUN 2017. Malang: Pemkot Malang. Diakses dari https://malangkota.go.id/lakip-kota-malang/
Pemkot Malang. (2019). LAKIP KOTA MALANG TAHUN 2018. Malang: Pemkot Malang. Diakses dari https://malangkota.go.id/lakip-kota-malang/
Pemkot Malang. (2020). LAKIP KOTA MALANG TAHUN 2019. Malang: Pemkot Malang. Diakses dari https://malangkota.go.id/lakip-kota-malang/
Speklé, Roland.F., & Verbeeten, Frank H.M. (2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004
Stoker, G. (1998) Governance as Theory: Five Propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00106
Suyanto. (2010). Menyoal Desentralisasi Fiskal: Mempertanyakan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Pemerintahan Daerah. Jakarta: STIA-LAN.
Widodo, Suparno. (2015). Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
If your paper is accepted, the author identified as the formal corresponding author for the paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Author Services; where via the JIAP Author Licensing Service they will be able to complete the license agreement on behalf of all authors on the paper.
