Determinasi Pelayanan Publik Pemerintahan Daerah: Paradoks di Era Desentralisasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2016.002.04.1Keywords:
decentralization, innovative public servicesAbstract
Decentralization, which is framed by Act 23 of 2014, aimed at improving public services corridor. Nevertheless, in the present state of local government in Indonesia, there is a paradox in empirical conditions. The area that was originally predicated as having the best public services, which is indicated by accepting autonomy award, it turns out the following year decline, not grow or stagnate. Only 16 percent of it is making progress in the public service. This article assumes that there are two conditions as the cause, that are: (1) Ambiguous will be the concept of innovation, (2) the organization's internal environment, especially the leadership of the head region. Therefore, the direction that should be done is not "how to realizethe innovation of public service" but rather "how to realize innovative public
services".
References
Aiken, Michael and Hage, Jerald. (1971). The Organic Organization and Innovation. Sociology, Vol. 5, No. 1 (January 1971), pp. 63-82.
Amabile, et al. (2004). Leader Behaviours and The Work Environment for Creativity: Perceived Leader Support. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol 14, pp. 5- 32.
Ashkanasy, Neal M., Wilderom, Celeste., & Peterson, Mark F. (2000). Handbook of Organizational Culture & Climate. Sage Publications Inc, California.
Azfar, Omar., et al. (1999). Decentralization,Governance and Public Services: The Impact of Institutional Arrangements. IRIS Center, University of Maryland, College Park.
Borins, Sanford. (2002). Leadership and Innovation in The Public Sector. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23/8 [2002], pp. 467-476.
Briscoe, John and Garn, Harvey. (1995). Financing Water Supply and Sanitation Under Agenda 21. Natural Resources Forum, 19(1), pp. 59-70.
Deschamps, Jean-Philippe. (2005). Different Leadership Skills for Different Innovation Strategies. Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 31-38.
Doner, Richard F., Hicken, Allen., & Ritchie , Bryan K. (2009). Political Challenges of Innovation in the Developing World. Review of Policy Research, Volume 26, Numbers 1–2, pp. 151-171.
Farazmand, Ali. (2004). Sound Governance: Policy and Administrative Innovations. Praeger Publisher, 88 Post Road West, New York.
Fenwick, John., & Tassabehji, Mark. (1999). Local government reorganisation in the UK: Decentralisation or Corporatism?. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 12, Issue: 3, pp.249 – 261.
Flynn, N. (1990). Public Sector Management. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
Groot, Lucy de. (2007). New Local Government Network Conference, I&DeA: Improvement and Development Agency. Dapat diakses http://www.idea.gov.uk/idk/core/page.do?pageId=1/ [Diakses pada 10 September 2016].
Gumusluoglu, Lale. (2009). Transformational Leadership and Organizational Innovation: The Roles of Internal and External Support for Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 26, pp. 264-277.
Hitt, Michael A., Ireland, R. Duane., & Hoskisson, Robert E. (2007), Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization 7ed. Thomson Higher Education, Mason, USA.
Howard, Larry W., Foster, S. thomas., & Shannon Patrick. (2005). Leadership, Perceived Team Climate and Process Improvement in Municipal Government. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 22, Issue. 8, pp. 769-795.
Huffman, Richard C., & Hegarty, W. Harvey. (1993). Top Management Influence on Innovations: Effects of Executive Characteristics and Social Culture. Journal of Management, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp. 549-574.
Imanuddin, Muhammad. (2016). Percepatan Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik, sinovik, Kim, Seok Eun and Chang, Gee Weon, Jun 2009, An Empirical Analysis of Innovativeness in Government: Findings and Implications. International Review of Administrative Sciences; Vol. 75, pp. 293 - 310.
Jung, D.I., Chow, C., and Wu, A. (2003). The Role of Transformational Leadership in Enhancing Organizational Innovation: Hypothesis and Some Preliminary Findings. Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 14 Nos 4/5, pp. 525-44.
Kemendagri. (2014). Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Kementerian Dalam Negeri. Dapat diakses pada http://www.kemendagri.go.id/pages/lakip/lakip-kemendagri/ [Diakses 20 September 2016].
Kim ,W. Chan and Mauborgne, Renée. (2005). The Blue Ocean Strategy. Harvard Business School Press, Brighton.
Kim, Seok Eun and Chang, Gee Weon, (2009). An Empirical Analysis of Innovativeness in Government: Findings and Implications. International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 75, pp. 293 - 310.
Kim, Soonhee. (2009). Managerial Leadership, the Climate for Creativity, and a Culture of Innovation and Performance-Driven in Local Government. Working Paper, Paper Prepared for the PMRA Conference 2009,Oct 1-2, 2009, Columbus, Ohio.
Leavy, Brian. (2005). A Leader’s Guide to Creating an Innovation Culture. Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 38-45.
Litvack, Jennie and Seddon, Jessica. (1999). Decentralization Briefing Notes. World Bank Institute Working Papers, The World Bank.
Makri, Marianna., & Scandura, Terri A. (2010). Exploring The Effects of Creative CEO Leadership on Innovation in High-Technology Firms. The Leadership Quarterly. Volume 21, Issue 1, pp. 75-88.
McMillan, Charles. (2010). Five Competitive Forces of Effective Leadership and Innovation. Journal of Business & Strategy, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 11-22.
Morris, Langdon. (2006). Permanent Innovation, © Innovation Labs Flyn, N, 1990, Public Sector Management, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
Mulgan, G. & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the Public Sector. Working Paper Version 1.9, Strategy Unit, UK Cabinet Office.
Oates, Wallace. (1996). The Theory of Public Finance in a Federal System. Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. I, No.1, pp. 1121-1122.
Orange, Graham., Elliman, Tony., Kor, Ah Lian., & Tassabehji , Rana. (2007). Local Government and Social or Innovation Value. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 1, Issue: 3, pp. 242 – 254.
P¨arnaa, Ott., & Tunzelmann, Nick Von. (2007). Innovation in the Public Sector: Key Features Influencing the Development and Implementation of Technologically Innovative Public Sector Services in the UK, Denmark, Finland and Estonia. Information Polity, Vol. 12, pp. 109–125.
Paulsen, Neil., Maldonado, Diana., Callan, Victor J., & Ayoko, Oluremi. (2009). Charismatic Leadership, Change and Innovation in an R&D Organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 511-523.
Regmi, Krishna., Naidoo, Jennie., Greer, Alan., & Pilkington, Paul. (2010). Understanding the Effect of Decentralisation on Health Services: The Nepalese Experience. Journal of Health Organization and Management. Vol. 24, Issue: 4, pp.361 – 382.
Selman, Jim. (2004). Leadership and Innovation. Dapat diakses pada http://www.innovation.cc/discussionpapers/selman.pdf/[Diakses 20 September 2016].
Senge, Peter M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of The Learning Organization. Currency Doubleday, New York.
Shapiro, Stephen M. (2002). 24/7 Innovation: a Blueprint for Surviving and Thriving in an Age of Change. McGraw-Hill, United States of America.
Taylor, Colette M., Cornelius, Casey J., & Colvin , Kate. (2014). Visionary Leadership and its Relationship to Organizational Effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 35 Issue:6, pp.566 – 583.
Treisman, Daniel. (2000). Decentralization and The Quality of Government. Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles.
West, Loraine A., & Wong, Christine P.W. (1995). Fiscal Decentralization and Growing Regional Disparities in Rural China: Some Evidence in the Provision of Social Service. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 70-84.
Yoon, Jong In. (2006). Korean Government Innovation: Strategies and Methodologies for Administrative Innovation. Fifth Meeting of the Committee of Experts on Public Administration, United Nations, New York.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
If your paper is accepted, the author identified as the formal corresponding author for the paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Author Services; where via the JIAP Author Licensing Service they will be able to complete the license agreement on behalf of all authors on the paper.
