The Introduction of Detailed Spatial Planning in Sleman Regency

Agung Yuntoro


This study examined the possibilities of legalizing detailed spatial planning in Sleman regency. By using objectives analysis of project cycle management (PCM) method, 7 approaches were identified to introduce detailed spatial planning, namely: Motivation approaches, Central Government Policy Approaches, Law Enforcement Approaches, Relocation Approaches, Industrial Development Approaches, Business Development Approaches, and Coordination with Sultan’s office Approaches. From the 7 approaches, 4 approaches were selected most convincing combinations which are relocation approaches, industrial development approaches, business development approaches and coordination with sultan’s land approaches.

The examination of its feasibility were conducted by interviewing stakeholders in Sleman regency whose result showed that the first 3 approaches could be realized without serious problems while coordination with sultan’s land office approaches had to be handled with care because the authority of sultan’s land conversion was under the sultan’s office even though the location was in Sleman. To overcome these difficulties, Sleman regency must take initiative and be able to suggest to sultan’s office feasible idea of coordination with national land use planning. This being action research case, its actual applicability will be verified by initiating activities with Sleman regency government as its main promoter.


spatial planning coordination land use

Full Text:



Claire A. Jantz., James J. Manuel. 2013. “Estimating impacts of population growth and land use policy on ecosystem services A community-level case study in Virginia, USA”, Elsevier, Ecosystem Services.

Development Planning Board, Sleman regency in figure, Sleman; Development Planning Board, 2006-2014

FASID, 1997. “PCM management tool for development assistance”, Tokyo, Foundation for Advance Studies on International Development 1997.

Goldstein, J.H, Caldarone, G., Duarte, T.K., Ennaanay, D., Mendoza, G., Polasky, S.,Wolny, S., Daily., G.C. 2012. “Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions”, National Academy of Science, 109 (19), 7565–7570.

Hadiwinoto, KGPH. 2017. “Hanya Ada Satu Lembaga Resmi yang Mengurus Pemakaian Sultan Ground”,, Yogyakarta, March, 28.

Hasim, R. Alfiandri. 2016. “Politik hukum pengaturan sultan ground dalam undang-undang no. 13 tahun 2013 tentang keistimewaan Yogyakarta dan hukum tanah nasional”, Brawijaya University Journal, Malang.

Jolly, C.L., Torrey, B.B. 1993. “Population and Land Use in Developing Countries”.

Masyhuri, 2017. “Sultan’s land management in corporate farm”, Kedaulatan Rakyat, Yogyakarta, February, 20.

Ministry of Agriculture. 2013. Statistics of Agricultural Land, Jakarta; Ministry of Agriculture.

Ministry of Laws and Human Rights, 2012. “Indonesian laws number 13 concerning the privilege of Yogyakarta Province”, article 7, Jakarta; ministry of laws and human right.

Ministry of Laws and Human Rights, 2007. “Indonesian laws number 26 concerning national spatial planning”, article 11 p13, Jakarta; ministry of laws and human right.

National Disaster Agency, 2012. “Peta aliran sungai di wilayah gunung Merapi”,, Jakarta, December, 4.

Santosa, Urip, 2014. Kajian Komperehensif Hukum Agraria, Kencana, Jakarta.

Sleman Regency, 2012. “Sleman General Spatial Planning Regulation number 12”, appendix number VII, p.53, Sleman.

Sudjito, 2017. “Aturan Pertanahan di Yogyakarta Perlu Disosialisasikan”,, Yogyakarta, March, 28.

Sujarwoto, S. (2017). Why decentralization works and does not works? A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 1(3), 1-10.

Sujarwoto, S. (2012). Political decentralization and local public services performance in Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 2(3), 55-84.

Sujarwoto, S., & Tampubolon, G. (2016). Spatial inequality and the Internet divide in Indonesia 2010–2012. Telecommunications Policy, 40(7), 602-616.

United Nations, 2008. “SPATIAL PLANNING Key Instrument for Development and Effective Governance with Special Reference to Countries in Transition”, p.1, Geneva, United Nations.

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara.


  • There are currently no refbacks.