Integrated Advocacy Approaches In Refusing The Eviction Policy

Ramaditya Rahardian Daneswara, Nadya Audina S Kurnia

Abstract


This paper attempts to explore the approach of a policy advocacy pursued by residents of Central Jebres RT 02 and 03 RW 25, Jebres Village, Jebres Sub district, Surakarta City to reject the eviction policy carried out by the Surakarta City Government for the expansion of the Solo Techno Park (STP) land. A method in the study used descriptive qualitative namely the handling of their phenomena and give providing theoretical interpretation. The findings in the field indicate that the residents of Central Jebres conduct a series of policy advocacy, which among others, such as the formation of a core circle, choosing strategic issues, setting goals and strategies, processing data and packaging information, mobilizing supporters, influencing policy implementers, forming public opinion, creating a basis for movement and the latter monitor the work program. The results of the policy advocacy series conducted by the residents of Central Jebres who have joined the Jebres Demangan citizen alliance have not received positive results.

Keywords


policy advocacy; refusing; eviction.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adicahya, A., Watch, M. C., & Rights, L. (2017). Penggusuran Terhadap Pedagang Kaki Lima (PKL) Sebagai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Justicia Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 62–78.

Dugani, S., & Kissoon, N. (2017). Global advocacy needed for sepsis in children. Journal of Infection, 74, S61–S65.

Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change - Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 215–237.

Prianto, A. L. (2013). Model of Advocacy Coalitions in the Formulation of Spatial Plan Policy of Makassar in 2010-2030. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 20(3), 163–170.

Rahardian, R. (2018). Evaluating The Use of Paralegal Approach in Policy Advocacy, JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), Volume 22 Nomor 1, 14–19

Rennkamp, B., Haunss, S., Wongsa, K., Ortega, A., & Casamadrid, E. (2017). Competing coalitions: The politics of renewable energy and fossil fuels in Mexico, South Africa and Thailand. Energy Research and Social Science, 34(August), 214–223.

Sharma, R. R. (2016). An Introduction To Advocacy. Training Guide. Support The Analysis Research In Africa (SARA), Health And Human Resources Analysis For Africa (HHRAA). US Agency For International Development.

Sotirov, M., & Memmler, M. (2012). The advocacy coalition framework in natural resource policy studies - recent experiences and further prospects. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 51–64.

Suharto, E. (2014). Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Panduan Praktis Mengkaji Masalah Dan Kebijakan Sosial. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Topatimasang, R. (2016). Mengubah Kebijakan Publik Panduan Pelatihan Advokasi. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.

Widianto, H., & Suyanto, T. (2017). Strategi bertahan masyarakat Stren Kali Jagir Wonokromo Surabaya dari penggusuran. Kajian Moral Dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(3), 1067–1081.

Wong, N. W. M. (2016). Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Change in China: A Case Study of Anti-incinerator Protest in Guangzhou. Voluntas, 27(5), 2037–2054.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.