Integrated Advocacy Approaches In Refusing The Eviction Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2018.004.04.8Keywords:
policy advocacy, refusing, evictionAbstract
This paper aimed to explore the approach of a policy advocacy pursued by residents of Central Jebres RT 02 and 03 RW 25, Jebres Village, Jebres Sub subdistrict, Surakarta City to reject the eviction policy carried out by the Surakarta City Government for the expansion of the Solo Techno Park (STP) land. The method used in this study was a descriptive qualitative namely the handling of their phenomena and providing theoretical interpretation. The findings in the field indicated that the residents of Central Jebres conducted a series of policy advocacy, which among others, such as the formation of a core circle, choosing strategic issues, setting goals and strategies, processing data and packaging information, mobilizing supporters, influencing policy implementer, forming public opinion, creating a basis for movement and the latter monitor the work program. The results of the policy advocacy series conducted by the residents of Central Jebres who had joined the Jebres Demangan citizen alliance had not received positive results.References
Adicahya, A., Watch, M. C., & Rights, L. (2017). Penggusuran Terhadap Pedagang Kaki Lima (PKL) Sebagai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Justicia Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 1(1), pp.62–78.
Dugani, S., & Kissoon, N. (2017). Global advocacy needed for sepsis in children. Journal of Infection, Vol. 74, pp.S61–S65.
Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change - Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 18, pp.215–237.
Prianto, A. L. (2013). Model of Advocacy Coalitions in the Formulation of Spatial Plan Policy of Makassar in 2010-2030. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, Vol. 20(3), pp.163–170.
Rahardian, R. (2018). Evaluating The Use of Paralegal Approach in Policy Advocacy. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik), Vol. 22, No. 1, pp.14–19
Rennkamp, B., Haunss, S., Wongsa, K., Ortega, A., & Casamadrid, E. (2017). Competing coalitions: The politics of renewable energy and fossil fuels in Mexico, South Africa and Thailand. Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 34(August), pp.214–223.
Sharma, R. R. (2016). An Introduction To Advocacy: Training Guide. Support The Analysis Research In Africa (SARA), Health And Human Resources Analysis For Africa (HHRAA)., U.S. Agency for International Development, Africa Bureau.
Sotirov, M., & Memmler, M. (2012). The advocacy coalition framework in natural resource policy studies - recent experiences and further prospects. Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 16, pp.51–64.
Suharto, E. (2014). Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Panduan Praktis Mengkaji Masalah dan Kebijakan Sosial. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Topatimasang, R. (2016). Mengubah Kebijakan Publik Panduan Pelatihan Advokasi. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.
Widianto, H., & Suyanto, T. (2017). Strategi bertahan Masyarakat Stren Kali Jagir Wonokromo Surabaya dari penggusuran. Kajian Moral Dan Kewarganegaraan, Vol. 5(3), pp.1067–1081.
Wong, N. W. M. (2016). Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Change in China: A Case Study of Anti-incinerator Protest in Guangzhou. Voluntas, Vol. 27(5), pp.2037–2054.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
If your paper is accepted, the author identified as the formal corresponding author for the paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Author Services; where via the JIAP Author Licensing Service they will be able to complete the license agreement on behalf of all authors on the paper.
