Media Kampanye untuk Perubahan Kebijakan Melalui Video: Pembelajaran Dari Desa Lakardowo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap/2023.009.02.8Keywords:
advocacy; civil society organization; non-governmental organization; videoAbstract
The article in this research is to describe a series of advocacy processes carried out by Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in fighting for the right to a healthy environment to reject the existence of hazardous and toxic waste processing industries in Lakardowo village, District Jetis, Mojokerto Regency with social media platforms such as online videos on YouTube as a means of struggle. Qualitative approach is used in this research, meanwhile data collection technique is done by in-depth interview and documentation technique. The technique of determining informants is by purposive sampling. The results of the study show that advocacy carried out by Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) has been able to influence public awareness at large and provide support for advocacy carried out, but for changes in environmental permit policies to date have not been able to change policies that have been implemented have been made by existing policy makers.
References
Andriadi, F. (2017). Partisipasi Politik Virtual: Demokrasi Netizen Di Indonesia. RMBOOKS.
As’ad, M. (2020, January). Salah Kelola Limbah Berbahaya: Pengelolaan Limbah Berbahaya dan Beracun Dari Rumah Sakit di Jawa Timur Bermasalah Dari Hulu Hingga Hilir. Mengancam Kesehatan Masyarakat. Tempo.Co. https://majalah.tempo.co/read/159491/salah-kelola-limbah-berbahaya?hidden=login.
Daneswara, R. R., & Kurnia, N. A. S. (2019). Integrated Advocacy Approaches In Refusing The Eviction Policy. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik (JIAP), 4(4), 343-348. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2018.004.04.8
Dye, T. R. (2013). Understanding Public Policy 14th Edition, Pearson Education, Inc.
Gregory, S., Caldwell, G., & Avni, T. H. R. (2005). Video For Change: A Guide For Advocacy And Activism. Pluto Press.
Limano, F. (2019). Developing Ways Of Thinking In Society Using Online Video : A Case Of Sexy Killers Video, 10(November), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v10i3.5750
Liu, D. (2019). Advocacy channels and political resource dependence in authoritarianism : Nongovernmental organizations and environmental policies in China. Governance, 32(April), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12431
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage Publication.
Neuwman, L. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif (Edisi 7). PT. Indeks.
Peters, B. G. (2016). American Public Policy: Promise and Performance 10th Edition. Sage Publications. Ltd.
Rahardian, R. (2020). Mehamai Advokasi Kebijakan: Konsep, Teori, Praktik Dalam Mewujudkan Kebijakan Yang Berpihak Pada Publik. Deepublish Publisher.
Rahardian, R., & Zarkasi, I. F. (2019). Policy Advocacy in Resolving an Environmental Preservation Conflict: A Case of Policy Advocacy between the Government, Private Sector and Society in Kayen, Pati, Central Java. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik), 23(2), 154-170.
Topatimasang, R., Mansour, F., & Rahardjo, T. (2016). Merubah Kebijakan Publik : Panduan Pelatihan Advokasi Untuk Organisasi Non Pemerintah. Pustaka Pelajar.
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Information Society, 19(4), 315–326.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
If your paper is accepted, the author identified as the formal corresponding author for the paper will receive an email prompting them to login into Author Services; where via the JIAP Author Licensing Service they will be able to complete the license agreement on behalf of all authors on the paper.
